Who should McCain choose as his VP?
By DAN ROSS
Register Online Editor
August 29th, 2008
August 24th, 2008
August 23rd, 2008
August 19th, 2008
OK, folks, you've been debating online here for about two weeks now whether John McCain or Barack Obama is your choice for president.
Now it is time to take the debate one step further, and make your suggestions for the vice presidential candidates.
In this forum, only comments on McCain are being posted.
In another forum, only Obama comments are being posted.
So go for it, positive debate about the VP's here, no other-party bashing allowed.
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
coigue wrote on Jun 18, 2008 3:54 PM:
heh "
ADark1 wrote on Jun 18, 2008 4:54 PM:
a teacher wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:12 PM:
Apparently the common name given for the RICHARD is deemed inappropriate for the NVR moderator.
I don't know what is funnier. The fact that I have to write D**k Cheney, or how right that some how seems to me. "
a teacher wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:21 PM:
kevin wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:40 PM:
Common Sense wrote on Jun 19, 2008 8:44 AM:
McCain would be guaranteed a November victory with her on the ballot!
Bobby Jindal is my second choice. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 19, 2008 10:53 PM:
XMAN wrote on Jun 20, 2008 1:50 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Jun 20, 2008 8:47 AM:
TrickleDown, even though I'm not particularly religious, thanks for highlighting the liberal anger toward Christianity. McCain can use all the help he can get. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 20, 2008 4:22 PM:
Rocketman wrote on Jun 20, 2008 6:51 PM:
russ wrote on Jun 20, 2008 6:56 PM:
Bush won in over 90% of the counties in the United States. "
Hear Ye wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:44 PM:
You get offended easily. Bush beat Kerry in a landslide? Hilarious considering whoever won Ohio would have been president. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 21, 2008 12:47 AM:
And wow: 90% of the counties in the US? Let's see:
CA: 58 counties and 55 electoral votes
KS: 105 counties and 6 electoral votes
Keep shooting to win the most counties in the country and lets see how far McCain gets.
Landslide is the best comment of all. 18 electoral votes go Kerry's way (out of 538, or less than 4%) and he is president. In fact the last election closer than this in electoral votes was Woodrow Wilson in 1916. Landslide indeed! "
a teacher wrote on Jun 21, 2008 1:40 AM:
XMAN wrote on Jun 21, 2008 2:41 AM:
ADark1 wrote on Jun 21, 2008 5:43 AM:
"TrickleDown, even though I'm not particularly religious, thanks for highlighting the liberal anger toward Christianity. McCain can use all the help he can get. "
From what we've seen of the RR, he'd be MUCH better off w /out them! I think McCain needs someone who seems reasonable..then again, who's seen a reasonable Republican? That being said,Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, would be possibly his near best choice. Even if they have a bridge that goes nowhere! :) "
Fire Girl wrote on Jun 21, 2008 10:15 PM:
a teacher wrote on Jun 22, 2008 8:04 AM:
coigue wrote on Jun 22, 2008 2:55 PM:
"Elitists" is not a demographic. "
JustMy$.02 wrote on Jun 23, 2008 3:39 PM:
"The only way McCain can take the white house in this election is if he gets the religious on his side, but as the christians have wisened up the only way they are going to go along with McCain is if Jesus himself is on the ticket"
So who is the RR going to vote for if not McCain?
This is why McCain will win this election, he doesnt loose his base, even if they dont like him, because the base WILL NOT vote for Obama. And on the flip side McCain is close enough to the center to pull in certain demographic liberals.
Obama is too far left to pull many, if any, conservatives. Thats how I see it anyway. It wont be a landslide but McCain will win this. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 24, 2008 8:39 AM:
kevin wrote on Jun 24, 2008 9:18 AM:
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 24, 2008 9:38 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:31 AM:
How is "Jesus" a constructive candidate for the McCain VP discussion? At least some of the posts removed from the Obama VP discussion forum had suggestions consisting of LIVING people.
I'm not particularly religious, but seriously, this deleting of some post and not others smells of liberal bias. Perception is everything. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 24, 2008 1:06 PM:
Oh, and let's compare our proposed VP's based on the constitutional requirement of a VP:
1: Natural born citizen of U.S.
2: 35 or older
3: been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States
Hmmm...both our proposals hit #2 and the voting bloc of which I speak would argue my proposal satisfies 3. Nowhere is "living" a requirement in the letter of the law.
Pretty much equivalent candidates we proposed, except I gave an argument for mine...and lo-and-behold each is still up. CLEARLY a case of media bias!!!! I am going to start the "media bias" claim drinking game. I should be passed out by lunch every day. "
common sense wrote on Jun 24, 2008 6:01 PM:
Yet another example of liberal contempt for religion. "
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 25, 2008 1:36 AM:
misfit wrote on Jun 25, 2008 8:06 AM:
charleslawlesss wrote on Jun 25, 2008 9:02 AM:
Common Sense wrote on Jun 25, 2008 12:16 PM:
Regarding Alaska Governor Sarah Palin versus other Republican contenders, there are 3 criticisms that come up:
1. She is "too unkown and inexperienced".
-This argument could be made for almost any potential VP candidate. Nobody complains about Charlie Crist's experience, despite the fact that he and Palin were both elected in 2006. In fact, Palin was elected to her first office (city council) in 1988, four years before Crist's first election as a State Senator in 1992.
2. "She is not only based far from the continental 48 — and in a state with just three electoral votes that should already be in the bag for the GOP".
-The Vice Presidency is about leadership, not geography, and this argument is an insult to every American who lives in a small state. At any rate, there is one school of thought says the current electoral map requires John McCain to select a Northern (and preferably Northwestern) running mate.
3. "No foreign policy credentials or experience."
-This is a blatant example of a double standard being applied to Palin. Gov. Palin has at least the same level of foreign policy gravitas as almost every other Governor...and probably more: Alaska does not border another state, but is instead sandwiched between a key allied nation (Canada) and an more adversarial country (Russia). In her role as Alaska Governor, she often performs duties more similar to a President. "
ADark1 wrote on Jun 26, 2008 7:50 PM:
"It is just like my grandpappy used to say: although you may say something about a deity that believers do not find offensive, one must never forget about those who don't believe and ARE offended if the name of that deity is used as it tarnishes the image that nonbeliever carries in their head of the deity in whom they don't believe. RIP grandpappy. You were right once again. "
The ayes have it! lol!
I am seriously considering writing an editorial on the politics of religion in politics!.....I just need one more thing to push me over the edge! "
a teacher wrote on Jun 26, 2008 11:27 PM:
bettye wrote on Jun 27, 2008 9:41 PM:
misfit wrote on Jul 15, 2008 10:23 PM:
Perfect! "
Webster9 wrote on Aug 4, 2008 9:42 PM:
McCain/Cantor "