Eighth-grade algebra is on the way
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
Only half of California’s eighth graders take an algebra class during the school year — but not for long.
Within three years, eighth-grade students will be required to take a standardized algebra test, according to a recent decision by the California Board of Education. California will become the first state in the nation to implement the requirement when the new policy takes effect in fall of 2011.
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, students must be tested on material they are taught each year, but the change in algebra policy comes after the state board moved to hold all California eighth graders to the same standards, said Elena Toscano, Napa Valley Unified School District’s assistant superintendent of instruction.
Under existing policy, she said, eighth-grade students are tested annually on either general math or algebra, depending on their course of study.
Advocates of the change, including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, say the mandate will motivate students to rise to the challenge while also laying the groundwork for their future success.
“Now we must ensure that our schools have the resources, the teachers, and the curriculum to meet this great challenge,” Schwarzenegger said in a press statement. “I am committed to doing everything in my power to make sure they succeed. Algebra is the key that unlocks the world of science, innovation, engineering and technology. This is California’s future.”
Meanwhile, members of the California Teachers Association — which officially opposes the mandate — insist that the change is yet another testing mandate that is out of touch with realities on public school campuses, and that it sets tens of thousands of California students up for failure.
“The state Board of Education’s action to force all eighth-grade students to take a standardized algebra test is another one-size-fits-all approach that punishes students and public schools ... It is another outlandish example of the No Child Left Behind Act and the federal government dictating to California how to teach our students, and of political leaders making irresponsible decisions that will hurt our kids,” CTA President David Sanchez said in a prepared statement.
In recent years, Toscano said, NVUSD teachers began teaching age-appropriate “algebraic thinking” curriculum to younger students, preparing them for the course before they entered the eighth grade. Still, she said, the mandate will present substantial funding and staffing challenges.
Brenda Hensley, a Napa County resident who teaches seventh-and eighth-grade math at Vacaville’s Willis Jepson Middle School, agreed. To provide needed services to students, she said, districts will need to hire more teachers at a time when California faces more than a $15 billion deficit. As it is, she said, schools are having a tough time recruiting enough qualified math teachers.
“Teachers have no objections to high standards and accountabilities. But we want them to be reasonable standards and we want them to be good for kids,” Hensley said.
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
steph wrote on Aug 3, 2008 12:49 AM:
Also, what exemptions are allowed for recent immigrants new to the country, or others whose prior education cannot be verified? What excemptions are allowed for children with learning disabilities?
I'm curious.
But gosh, if the most advanced, wealthiest country can catch up academically to most of the rest of the world, this will be a good thing. (Finally.) "
common sense wrote on Aug 3, 2008 8:28 AM:
kbf wrote on Aug 3, 2008 8:44 AM:
Dwayne wrote on Aug 3, 2008 11:55 AM:
I went to school in the 1950's (blush), and I started my first algebra class in the 8th grade. It was the first year that any class was an elective, and I remember it because there were no girls in the class to stare at. Bummer... "
Unclestuy wrote on Aug 3, 2008 3:22 PM:
a teacher wrote on Aug 3, 2008 9:02 PM:
In my experience, about a third to a half of 8th graders are ready for algebra. Pushing them to take it when they are not ready produces failures and life long math haters. My question is: what's the hurry?
Traditionally, Algebra is taught in 9th grade, Geometry in 10th grade, Algebra 2 in 11th grade and seniors take a math elective. Advanced 8th graders take Algebra.
To answer Steph's question: The score students get on state tests have little impact on students or teachers. The results come in after class assignments are made. They may change how we teachers go about our business, I always want to know where I need improvement or where I'm doing well.
This might make you angry. In 8 years I've never seen a student retained. Even students who fail all four academic classes go on to 8th grade. I know that a large number of kids I get from 6th grade have failed 6th grade math. I, however, don't get to reteach 6th grade math. My job is to teach 7th grade math.
I don't work in NVUSD, but don't sigh relief yet. I asked my daughters how many kids were retained in their school. They said none. "
a teacher wrote on Aug 3, 2008 9:06 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 4, 2008 1:25 PM:
Do we really want our future to be filled with robots because the social, and not very math oriented students were weeded out of the system? Boy, if ever there was an example of natural selection, this is it.
Let's put those who do well in math on a math/engineering tract; those who do moderately well in both English and math on a liberal arts type college tract; and those who are not particularly strong in academics or who desire to be more occupationally oriented on a vocational tract. Our brains are not all wired equally. And just because someone cannot ace math, it does not mean they are a bad person, and yet our "sameness" goal oriented school system weeds them out as though they have committed a crime. I'd rather see them pass an intro to algebra test in 8th grade than forcing them to take algebra 2 in high school and having them fail and drop out. This comes back to tax our system both socially and financially later on. "
a teacher wrote on Aug 4, 2008 3:42 PM:
"Do we really want our future to be filled with robots because the social, and not very math oriented students were weeded out of the system?"
THAT is a big part of the problem. Just because a person is intelligent, it does not mean that they are socially inept, emotionless or weird. Every year I have to fight to get intelligent kids over the fear that by being smart they will be called "NERDS".
The biggest problem in our country is that we don't really like smart people. We'd rather be popular. If you look at the countries that routinely beat us educationally, they all value intelligence. When the USA follows their lead we'll do better. "